I'm done with handouts. I have enough handouts. I'll post handouts here for FREE as I make them during the year. If someone really needs a handout, take it. Whatever.
I started this blog because I was tired after a few years of seeing fourth and fifth year teachers bragging about how wonderful they are. Yes, I'm sure they are great. I'm sure they have great ideas. I definitely learn a lot from them. I appreciate them sharing their ideas. UNTIL they start to sell me something that is little more than a handout. I figured, I've been teaching for twenty-four years, I've got a bunch of letters after my name and I have a bunch of recognition things, I can share what I know as well as a fourth year teacher. Hence, this blog. Whether or not anyone reads it.
So far this summer I've taken two webinars on "innovative ideas." The presenters did have very good ideas and presented information in a cogent way with relevant research explained well. I wasn't blown away by anything, though. Maybe I've just been to so many workshops and conferences, I just don't think there's a need for people to tell me the obvious.
- Get kids involved in the learning.
- If they do, they learn. If they listen, they might not be learning.
- RTI, ELA, CCCS, buzz buzz buzz, we all know the words.
- Formative assessment, summative assessment, flexible grouping, facilitating learning.
Here's an example of how I use "think pair share." When was teaching descriptive adjectives and adjective agreement, I asked students to turn to their neighbor and say a Spanish sentence describing themselves, another sentence describing their partner, and a third sentence describing someone famous (could be a teacher, the rule was they had to be nice about people we know in real life). Is that the right thing? I don't know. If the purpose of think pair share is to further process your own understanding, the idea that "to teach is to learn twice," then my example isn't the right thing. If the purpose of think pair share is to explain what you know so you and your partner can process together and check each other's understanding, and also to give a chance for the teacher to do some quick formative assessment by eavesdropping, then my example is definitely the right thing. (My example would not only require the students to use the correct adjective but also to use the masculine or feminine adjective form AND the appropriate form of the verb SER in a sentence. It actually gives the teacher an opportunity to see which students can apply AND integrate new skills and possibly pinpoint which students need targeted support on different parts of the language learning sequence.) Would an observer who isn't familiar with language learning understand the difference? I'm not sure.
But there's a bigger mystery to me. WHY are so many teachers selling their wares, their lessons and handouts and ideas? And why are so many teachers willing to buy a handout rather than spend 10 minutes (at most) making their own?

